Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has expressed support for new state laws that restrict the wearing of masks or head coverings during protests, in response to the rising number of extremist gatherings. This move follows a recent neo-Nazi rally in New South Wales, which sparked public debate over both safety and freedom of speech.
The incident took place outside the New South Wales Parliament, where around 60 men dressed in black held banners and shouted extremist slogans. Police stated that the gathering had been notified seven days in advance under the Summary Offences Act and was not prohibited by any court, making it a “legal assembly.” New South Wales Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon explained that, after assessment, police initially saw no reason to intervene, but due to public backlash and insufficient internal communication, he will reassess the decision.
In an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Albanese stated that hate speech and Nazi slogans should have no place in society, and he supports state regulations on covering one’s face during protests. He noted that wearing masks makes it difficult to identify participants, which could facilitate illegal or hate-driven activities, whereas people engaging in legitimate political action should not be threatened simply because their identity is concealed. On whether the move impacts freedom of speech, the Prime Minister emphasized that free speech does not include inciting hatred, anti-Semitism, or violence.
Responses from legal and community organizations have been mixed. Jewish community groups in New South Wales strongly condemned the rally and called for a review of its legality, while the New South Wales Civil Liberties Council warned that excessive restrictions on protests could infringe on the right to peaceful assembly, particularly affecting those with medical, religious, or privacy needs. Critics argue that a blanket ban on masks could hinder peaceful demonstrations, increase enforcement risks, and make vulnerable groups more susceptible to surveillance and retaliation.