Connect with us

National News

New South Wales Anti-Protest Law Ruled Unconstitutional

Published

on

On October 16, 2025, the New South Wales Supreme Court ruled that a law granting police expanded powers to disperse protesters near places of worship was unconstitutional.

The ruling followed a challenge by the Palestine Action Group (PAG) against the state government’s new law passed in February 2025. PAG’s lawyers argued that the vague wording of the law made it difficult for both protesters and law enforcement to clearly understand its scope. As a result, many people might self-censor and refrain from political protests in public spaces for fear of being removed or charged.

The law was part of a broader set of reforms introduced by the state government in response to recent antisemitic incidents. One provision prohibited obstructing the entrances of places of worship or harassing, threatening, or intimidating people entering these places, with violations carrying a maximum two-year prison sentence. The law also gave police “move-on” powers near or inside places of worship, regardless of whether the protest targeted the religious site itself.

Justice Anna Mitchelmore ruled that the law placed an “impermissible burden” on the freedom of political communication implied in the Australian Constitution. The “in or near” move-on powers were not limited to protests directed at the religious site, making the law overly broad and creating a chilling effect on lawful protests.

The state argued that the law had an “obvious and legitimate purpose” of protecting worshippers from verbal or physical harassment, threats, or intimidation. Michael Sexton SC, representing New South Wales, contended that the “in or near” wording applied only to protests directly targeting the site. However, Mitchelmore noted that the law was aimed at protests in general, not only those involving an immediate threat or harassment. In areas of civic significance, such as Town Hall or Hyde Park, protest routes often pass close to places of worship, and the law imposed burdens beyond what the Constitution permits.

PAG spokesperson Josh Lees said after the ruling that the group had never staged protests targeting religious sites, and the law extended police powers to any protest near such locations. NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson criticized the government for overreaching and restricting civil liberties under a climate of panic.

Continue Reading

National News

One Nation’s “Spot the Westerner” Video Condemned

Published

on

While One Nation as a political party has been gaining traction from the Australian public, its recent approach of releasing a video on 31st January 2026 about ‘spotting the Westerner’ has been publicly and socially condemned by many sides. 

The video was released by One Nation’s Victorian State Secretary Bianca Colecchia, who filmed strangers on the streets in Melbourne’s CBD and asked viewers to spot the Westerner in the same footage. She then further explained that the video is about demonstrating how multiculturalism is a failed concept, as ‘goodness in individuals can’t cancel cultural erosion brought by immigrants’, even going as far as to claiming westerners are now minorities due to new cultural populations from ‘non-culturally cohesive countries’. 

This video along with Colecchia’s statements have caused immense backlash. Liberal NSW Senator replies with how this is proof that One Nation is trying to divide Australians by damaging the core of Australia’s multiculturalism, while offering zero new solution to existing problems such as housing shortages that are incited by policy failures instead.  

Many others, namely Multicultural Affairs Minister Anne Aly and Ethnic Communities’ Council of Victoria chief executive Farah Farouque, also rightfully call out that the video is a selectively edited act of provocative populism, by undermining important contributions from skilled migrants. They both agree that migration is the foundation of Australia’s success, and therefore sensible Australians will reject the notion.

Continue Reading

National News

Littleproud retains leadership, Sussan Ley’s position uncertain

Published

on

National Party leader David Littleproud faced a leadership spill motion proposed by party MP Colin Boyce today. However, most observers believe he has enough support to survive the challenge and retain leadership.

The challenge stems from recent cracks between the Nationals and the Liberal Party. The Nationals withdrew from the coalition over the government’s handling of the Hate Speech Act, causing several shadow cabinet members to resign and creating a stalemate. Boyce advocated reuniting with the Liberals, warning that continued division could lead to loss of voter support.

The leadership position of Liberal Party leader Sussan Ley is also uncertain. Some party members wish to maintain stability without undermining her, while conservative supporters could challenge her in the coming weeks.

The Nationals are set to negotiate with Ley on whether to repair the coalition or allow the split to persist. Some Liberal MPs have drafted temporary shadow cabinet arrangements, potentially filling seats that have not rejoined the coalition in the short term.

Continue Reading

National News

Former member exposes Shincheonji recruiting pastors

Published

on

A former member who claims to have worked inside South Korea’s Shincheonji Church for several years told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) that he was part of a team responsible for contacting and recruiting other church pastors. This is not ordinary evangelical outreach; it is a strategic operation with plans, lists, and progress tracking, aiming to attract entire parishes or congregations to Shincheonji.

The former member, Matthew, said the team, called the “Pastor Evangelism Team,” targeted pastors across Australia to convince them to adopt Shincheonji teachings. Once a pastor changed allegiance, they would bring their entire congregation with them. At least ten pastors reportedly had ongoing dialogues with the team, and around five showed keen interest in joining. Internal records revealed that Shincheonji had compiled over a thousand Australian churches’ and pastors’ contact details, tracking progress of communication, whether the pastor knew the church had been labeled a cult, and whether they opposed it.

Melbourne pastor Rasenberger said he had received multiple contact invitations. Some invitations appeared to be “interchurch dialogue” or “Bible study sessions” but were actually disguised recruitment activities. Upon investigation, he immediately refused and warned colleagues that it was a cult.

Shincheonji founder Lee Man-hee claims to be “divinely inspired,” teaching that only he can interpret the true meaning of the Book of Revelation and promising salvation to believers at the end of days. Mainstream Christian churches generally consider Shincheonji a fringe religion or cult rather than traditional Christianity.

The report notes that Shincheonji’s Australian branch is registered as a charity, currently enjoying certain legal protections and tax benefits. Supporters of former members and aid organizations are calling on the government to review which groups can receive such benefits to prevent cults from exploiting legal loopholes.

Continue Reading

Trending