Connect with us

World News

Former top US infectious disease expert refuses to answer questions in ‘unhinged’ COVID-19 hearing

Published

on

Anthony Fauci, the former top US infectious disease expert, has declined to answer questions at a Republican-led Senate hearing about the origins of COVID-19 and his handling of the pandemic.

Dr Fauci, who is 85 and retired in 2022, was subpoenaed by Republican senator Rand Paul, who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and is a longtime adversary. He accused Senator Paul of an “unhinged” campaign to see him imprisoned and refused to answer more than 100 questions during the hearing on Wednesday, local time; While Senator Paul said Dr Fauci was not allowed to plead the Fifth Amendment right to refrain from answering senators’ questions, that a pardon from former US president Joe Biden would not protect him, and that there would be consequences for refusing to answer, adding the committee had scheduled a vote next week to hold Dr Fauci in contempt.

Dr Fauci led the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for 38 years, serving under multiple Republican and Democratic presidents, and also was a leader in the US government’s federal response to HIV and other infectious diseases, long before the COVID pandemic.

In 2020, he became the face of the US government’s response to COVID-19 and subsequently the subject of partisan attacks and death threats. More than 1.1 million people died of COVID-19 in the US, prompting a long-running effort by conservatives to assign blame for the toll.

Dr Fauci became the primary target of that anger, criticised for lockdown directives, guidance on mask-wearing and social distancing, and his promotion of vaccines. US President Donald Trump has long criticised him, taking to social media to say Dr Fauci’s ideas “were CRAZY” before the hearing.

Federal law makes it a crime to knowingly and wilfully make a “materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation” to Congress, potentially exposing Dr Fauci to prison if prosecutors decided he lied after being pardoned. Republicans criticised Dr Fauci for refusing to answer and claimed federal law and a 19th-century US Supreme Court decision required him to testify.

The 1896 decision lets Congress compel testimony from witnesses by immunising them from criminal prosecution for what they say, without violating the witnesses’ Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Dr Fauci even invoked the Fifth when Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, asked him what day it was and what colour his tie and the carpet were.

Ohio Republican senator Bernie Moreno repeatedly asked if Dr Fauci would apologise to various groups Senator Moreno claimed were harmed by pandemic-era policies for which he blamed Dr Fauci. Senator Paul also has for years called for Dr Fauci’s indictment and accused him of lying to Congress about whether the National Institutes of Health funded virus research in Wuhan, China, and of helping cover up COVID’s origins.

Senator Paul had David Schertler, one of Dr Fauci’s lawyers, removed from the hearing after refusing to recognise his attempts to speak. In a statement, Mr Schertler called Senator Paul’s pursuit “an obsessive vendetta” and said the accusations “are false and disgraceful, and we will examine all options to hold him accountable”.

Continue Reading

World News

Hong Kong court to rule on ex-Stand News editor’s appeal bid against sedition conviction in 6 months

Published

on

A Hong Kong appellate court will rule within six months on a bid by former Stand News editor Patrick Lam to overturn his sedition conviction, following intense debate over whether an article published by the now-defunct media outlet stoked hatred against the authorities.

Lam was found guilty alongside his predecessor Chung Pui-kuen in August 2024 – a case widely seen as a blow to press freedom in Hong Kong. The case revolved around 17 articles published by Stand News in 2020 and 2021 that authorities deemed seditious. Trial judge Kwok Wai-kin ruled that 11 of those articles were proven to be offensive as they stoked hatred against the government in the wake of the 2019 protests and unrest.

David Ma, representing Lam, told three Court of Appeal judges on Tuesday that only one of the 11 problematic articles was published under Lam’s watch as acting editor-in-chief. Ma argued that the article – a feature report marking the second anniversary of clashes between police and students on the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) campus in November 2019 – was wrongly ruled as seditious by the trial judge.

He said the article featured interviews with two former CUHK students who were granted anonymity and recalled their “subjective feelings” during the November 2019 clashes. One interviewee was quoted as saying they felt “despair” after overhearing a police officer comment: “Let it burn down.” However, the trial judge relied on “hindsight” when ruling the article problematic.

Separate from the 2020 Beijing-enacted security law, the homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance targets treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets and espionage. It allows for pre-charge detention of up to 16 days, and suspects’ access to lawyers may be restricted, with penalties involving up to life in prison. Article 23 was shelved in 2003 amid mass protests, remaining taboo for years. But, on March 23, 2024, it was enacted, having been fast-tracked and unanimously approved at the city’s opposition-free legislature.

Authorities cited perceived foreign interference and a constitutional duty to “close loopholes” after the 2019 protests and unrest. The law however has been criticised by rights NGOs, Western states and the UN as vague, broad and “regressive.”

Continue Reading

World News

Trump Meets Up with China and Venezuela Leaders

Published

on

US President Donald Trump broke decades of diplomatic protocol by personally traveling to Joint Base Andrews to greet Chinese President Xi Jinping upon his arrival for a three-day state visit. 

The extraordinary airport reception—featuring a red carpet, military band, and honor guard—marked the first time in over six decades a US president personally met a foreign leader at the airfield base, signaling an extraordinary level of deference to Beijing.

During this high-stakes summit, the two leaders are slated to engage in intensive bilateral negotiations covering trade tariffs, rare-earth export controls, semiconductor supply chain security, and foundational guardrails for artificial intelligence development. The closed-door agenda also encompasses pressing geopolitical friction points, including cross-strait security regarding Taiwan, global strategic stability amid the Russia-Ukraine war, military communications, and Middle East regional conflicts. Complementing the formal state proceedings, Trump has integrated top American tech executives—such as Nvidia’s Jensen Huang and SpaceX’s Elon Musk—into the state dinner itinerary, demonstrating Washington’s intent to navigate managed economic competition with Beijing alongside high-level diplomatic pageantry.

In stark contrast, Trump also held a high-profile meeting in New York with Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, smiling for photographs less than nine months after ordering a special forces raid that captured her former boss, Nicolás Maduro. The interaction took place at a Manhattan hotel just seven miles from the Brooklyn facility where Maduro is imprisoned. Following Maduro’s arrest, Trump had explicitly warned Rodríguez that failure to toe the US line would carry heavy consequences, prompting her government to cede control over Venezuela’s oil revenues and agree to a massive 65-billion-barrel oil deal.

Continue Reading

National News

Albanese announces $60m for Ukraine at Zelenskyy meeting

Published

on

Prime Minister Albanese has announced that Australia will provide an additional $60 million in support for Ukraine following a high-level meeting with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.

During the meeting, Albanese emotionally praised Zelenskyy’s leadership, referring to him as “my friend,” and signed a 10-year bilateral security agreement. The new support package allocates $45 million in ADF defense equipment, $10 million for Ukraine’s energy support fund, and $5 million in humanitarian aid. This brings Australia’s total commitments to Ukraine to $1.9 billion since the 2022 Russian invasion. The agreement also outlines long-term security cooperation, including enhanced military training and joint production initiatives for drones, missiles, and air defense systems.

Continue Reading

Trending