Connect with us

National News

Australian Government Meets With Tech Giants Over Upcoming Social Media Ban for Under-16s

Published

on

The Australian government has begun talks this week with executives from major social media platforms to discuss the implementation of its upcoming “under-16 social media ban.” Communications Minister Anika Wells said the government is meeting with representatives from Meta, Snapchat, YouTube, and TikTok to outline how the world-first age restriction policy will be enforced. Wells emphasized that platforms must “actively cooperate with the government” to ensure their systems comply with the new law.

The ban, set to take effect on December 10, aims to protect children from harmful and manipulative algorithms. Wells stated that while social media has its benefits, “harm to children should never be tolerated,” urging platforms to work with eSafety on both technical and administrative adjustments. Although Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter) is not part of this week’s meetings, it is scheduled to hold discussions with the government in November.

Reactions from social media companies have been mixed. Many expressed concern that the policy is being implemented too hastily, arguing there hasn’t been enough time to develop practical solutions. However, the government’s Age Verification Technology Trial Report found that Australia already has multiple privacy-safe and effective methods to verify users’ ages. Still, it acknowledged that no single method can solve every issue, meaning platforms may need to combine various tools to ensure compliance. Violators could face fines of up to AUD 49.5 million.

Under the new rules, platforms will be required to take “reasonable steps” to detect and deactivate underage accounts and prevent re-registration. They cannot rely solely on self-declared ages and must continuously monitor and improve verification systems. However, they are not required to verify every user’s age, nor can they mandate government ID as the only form of proof. Personal verification data will not be stored, with records focused on systems and processes instead.

The government stressed that the core goal of the law is to protect children’s online safety while avoiding unnecessary burdens on platforms and users.

Continue Reading

National News

ACCC Sues Microsoft for Misleading Australian Consumers

Published

on

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) recently filed a lawsuit against Microsoft, accusing the company of misleading approximately 2.7 million Australian personal and household users after integrating the AI assistant Copilot into Microsoft 365 subscription plans on October 31, 2024.

The ACCC stated that Microsoft’s promotion only informed users that they would need to accept the new Copilot-inclusive plan and pay a higher fee, or cancel their subscription. It did not clearly indicate that users could retain the original “Classic Plan” without Copilot. This option was only presented when users started the cancellation process, leading many consumers to upgrade or cancel without full knowledge.

Microsoft responded that it will carefully review the ACCC’s claims, emphasizing that consumer trust and transparency are priorities and that it will cooperate with regulators to ensure all practices comply with legal and ethical standards.

The ACCC is seeking court orders, including fines, injunctions, consumer compensation, and litigation costs. Experts say that if Microsoft is found guilty of misleading behavior, it could face significant fines and set an important precedent for transparency in subscription services and AI promotion globally.

Continue Reading

National News

Australian Government Refuses Copyright Exemption for AI Training

Published

on

The Australian government recently stated it will not grant copyright exemptions to AI companies, prohibiting the use of local creative works for AI model training without authorization. This position responds to opposition from the creative industries to the Productivity Commission’s proposal, which suggested that allowing AI to perform “text and data mining” could potentially generate up to AUD 116 billion in economic growth.

The government emphasized that copyright protection remains a cornerstone for safeguarding creators’ income and the creative ecosystem. Attorney-General Michelle Rowland noted that while Australia will explore adjustments to AI and copyright laws, it will not currently consider any exemption for AI training. She also revealed a dedicated taskforce has been established to assess AI’s potential impact on the creative industry and economy, seeking to balance innovation with protection of creators’ rights.

Creators and artists welcomed the move, saying it prevents large tech companies from exploiting copyrighted content without compensation. However, some tech companies and industry observers warned it may slow AI development and place Australia at a disadvantage in the global AI competition.

Continue Reading

National News

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price Defends Herself in Federal Court Defamation Case

Published

on

Northern Territory Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price recently appeared in the Federal Court in Darwin to defend herself regarding a press release she issued in July 2024.

The press release accused Central Land Council (CLC) CEO Lesley Turner of losing support among colleagues and called for a leadership change to ensure the council could more effectively represent Indigenous community interests.

During two days of cross-examination, Price was questioned by lawyers on whether she had adequately verified the claims in the press release. She denied that the claims were false or maliciously defamatory and emphasized that her statements were based on information and reports available at the time. Turner’s lawyers pointed out that Price had previously sent letters accusing the CLC of not giving her the opportunity to respond during the “Voice to Parliament” debates and questioned whether her actions were contradictory.

The court will examine whether the press release constitutes defamation, whether it is protected under public interest, and whether the senator followed reasonable verification standards. Both parties are expected to make closing submissions next Tuesday, after which the judge will make a ruling.

Continue Reading

Trending