Connect with us

National News

Victorian Opposition Pledges to Repeal Indigenous Treaty Bill if Elected

Published

on

The Victorian opposition recently announced that if it wins the 2026 state election, it will repeal the state’s Indigenous Treaty Bill within the first 100 days of office, replacing it with a “First Nations Victoria Department” and a consultative body. The announcement has sparked strong backlash from the government and Indigenous councils.

The Treaty Bill, currently under debate in the state parliament, aims to establish the Victorian First Peoples’ Assembly as a permanent electoral institution representing traditional landowners as well as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities across the state. After nearly a year of negotiations between the government and parliament, the bill is expected to pass with the support of Labor and crossbench MPs. The new law would grant the Assembly the power to advise on government policy and hold ministers accountable through public hearings, seen as a key reform to promote Indigenous self-determination and advance Closing the Gap initiatives.

Melina Bath, Nationals MP and opposition spokesperson for Indigenous affairs, stated that the Treaty Bill is not the best means to reduce disparities or improve outcomes for Indigenous communities. The opposition plans to consolidate Indigenous affairs under a single minister and release regular “Closing the Gap” progress reports, replacing the broad oversight and accountability powers granted to the Assembly under the original treaty. Liberal Party leader Brad Battin added that Labor has failed to deliver real change, and the opposition will adopt a more “pragmatic” policy, working with Indigenous organizations, elders, and communities to ensure culturally safe and locally informed policy.

The announcement was sharply criticized by both the government and the Assembly. Labor Premier Jacinta Allan condemned the opposition’s pledge, saying it would “destroy” a decade of work between the government and Indigenous communities. Ngarra Murray, co-chair of the First Peoples’ Assembly, stated that the treaty symbolizes an end to top-down policymaking, ensuring that Indigenous people are no longer politically exploited. Another co-chair, Rueben Berg, emphasized that the treaty is intended to strengthen communities within the state, not to create division.

Continue Reading

National News

ACCC Sues Microsoft for Misleading Australian Consumers

Published

on

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) recently filed a lawsuit against Microsoft, accusing the company of misleading approximately 2.7 million Australian personal and household users after integrating the AI assistant Copilot into Microsoft 365 subscription plans on October 31, 2024.

The ACCC stated that Microsoft’s promotion only informed users that they would need to accept the new Copilot-inclusive plan and pay a higher fee, or cancel their subscription. It did not clearly indicate that users could retain the original “Classic Plan” without Copilot. This option was only presented when users started the cancellation process, leading many consumers to upgrade or cancel without full knowledge.

Microsoft responded that it will carefully review the ACCC’s claims, emphasizing that consumer trust and transparency are priorities and that it will cooperate with regulators to ensure all practices comply with legal and ethical standards.

The ACCC is seeking court orders, including fines, injunctions, consumer compensation, and litigation costs. Experts say that if Microsoft is found guilty of misleading behavior, it could face significant fines and set an important precedent for transparency in subscription services and AI promotion globally.

Continue Reading

National News

Australian Government Refuses Copyright Exemption for AI Training

Published

on

The Australian government recently stated it will not grant copyright exemptions to AI companies, prohibiting the use of local creative works for AI model training without authorization. This position responds to opposition from the creative industries to the Productivity Commission’s proposal, which suggested that allowing AI to perform “text and data mining” could potentially generate up to AUD 116 billion in economic growth.

The government emphasized that copyright protection remains a cornerstone for safeguarding creators’ income and the creative ecosystem. Attorney-General Michelle Rowland noted that while Australia will explore adjustments to AI and copyright laws, it will not currently consider any exemption for AI training. She also revealed a dedicated taskforce has been established to assess AI’s potential impact on the creative industry and economy, seeking to balance innovation with protection of creators’ rights.

Creators and artists welcomed the move, saying it prevents large tech companies from exploiting copyrighted content without compensation. However, some tech companies and industry observers warned it may slow AI development and place Australia at a disadvantage in the global AI competition.

Continue Reading

National News

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price Defends Herself in Federal Court Defamation Case

Published

on

Northern Territory Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price recently appeared in the Federal Court in Darwin to defend herself regarding a press release she issued in July 2024.

The press release accused Central Land Council (CLC) CEO Lesley Turner of losing support among colleagues and called for a leadership change to ensure the council could more effectively represent Indigenous community interests.

During two days of cross-examination, Price was questioned by lawyers on whether she had adequately verified the claims in the press release. She denied that the claims were false or maliciously defamatory and emphasized that her statements were based on information and reports available at the time. Turner’s lawyers pointed out that Price had previously sent letters accusing the CLC of not giving her the opportunity to respond during the “Voice to Parliament” debates and questioned whether her actions were contradictory.

The court will examine whether the press release constitutes defamation, whether it is protected under public interest, and whether the senator followed reasonable verification standards. Both parties are expected to make closing submissions next Tuesday, after which the judge will make a ruling.

Continue Reading

Trending