Connect with us

National News

Australian Government Meets With Tech Giants Over Upcoming Social Media Ban for Under-16s

Published

on

The Australian government has begun talks this week with executives from major social media platforms to discuss the implementation of its upcoming “under-16 social media ban.” Communications Minister Anika Wells said the government is meeting with representatives from Meta, Snapchat, YouTube, and TikTok to outline how the world-first age restriction policy will be enforced. Wells emphasized that platforms must “actively cooperate with the government” to ensure their systems comply with the new law.

The ban, set to take effect on December 10, aims to protect children from harmful and manipulative algorithms. Wells stated that while social media has its benefits, “harm to children should never be tolerated,” urging platforms to work with eSafety on both technical and administrative adjustments. Although Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter) is not part of this week’s meetings, it is scheduled to hold discussions with the government in November.

Reactions from social media companies have been mixed. Many expressed concern that the policy is being implemented too hastily, arguing there hasn’t been enough time to develop practical solutions. However, the government’s Age Verification Technology Trial Report found that Australia already has multiple privacy-safe and effective methods to verify users’ ages. Still, it acknowledged that no single method can solve every issue, meaning platforms may need to combine various tools to ensure compliance. Violators could face fines of up to AUD 49.5 million.

Under the new rules, platforms will be required to take “reasonable steps” to detect and deactivate underage accounts and prevent re-registration. They cannot rely solely on self-declared ages and must continuously monitor and improve verification systems. However, they are not required to verify every user’s age, nor can they mandate government ID as the only form of proof. Personal verification data will not be stored, with records focused on systems and processes instead.

The government stressed that the core goal of the law is to protect children’s online safety while avoiding unnecessary burdens on platforms and users.

Continue Reading

National News

Former Journalist Peter Hardwick Faces Child Improper Treatment Charges

Published

on

Continue Reading

National News

Bupa Admits Misleading Thousands of Customers While Executives Receive Bonuses

Published

on

On October 19, 2025, Australian insurance company Bupa awarded over AUD 14 million in bonuses to more than 20 senior executives for the 2023–2024 fiscal year. One executive received AUD 2.5 million, more than double their AUD 1.1 million salary, while 19 others shared AUD 11.6 million in bonuses, including AUD 5.5 million in deferred payments.

This comes after Bupa admitted that between 2018 and 2023, over 7,500 customers were misled, resulting in canceled or delayed medical procedures. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) found some customers were incorrectly upgraded or denied timely medical treatment. Bupa agreed to pay AUD 35 million in fines, though the Federal Court has not yet determined if the penalty is appropriate.

Consumer Health Forum CEO Elizabeth Deveny criticized the bonuses, saying, “When a company breaches consumer trust, millions in executive bonuses send the wrong message.” Bupa stated that the issues stemmed from systemic errors rather than individual wrongdoing and implemented corrective measures since 2021, including AUD 14.3 million in compensation for 4,100 incorrect claims. They also disciplined executives and revised bonus policies.

Experts have noted that awarding large bonuses amid such failures highlights a corporate culture prioritizing financial performance over customer responsibility. It remains unclear if executives will be required to return part of their bonuses.

Continue Reading

National News

Melbourne Anti-Immigration Rally Clashes with Anti-Racism Protesters

Published

on

On October 19, 2025, large-scale anti-immigration protests erupted in Melbourne’s city center, coinciding with counter-protests against racism. The two groups clashed violently, resulting in two police officers being hospitalized. Police plan to use extensive CCTV and body-worn camera footage to identify and prosecute individuals who engaged in violent behavior. One woman may face charges.

The anti-immigration rally, organized by March for Australia, opposed what organizers describe as mass migration policies and attracted a large crowd. Victoria Police used flashbangs, pepper spray, and rubber bullets to control crowds and prevent escalation. Superintendent Wayne Cheeseman said members of the counter-protest, “United Against Racism: Migrants and Refugees Are Welcome,” were desperately trying to confront the anti-immigration demonstrators.

Protesters threw large rocks, glass bottles, and rotten fruit at police during the chaos. One female officer reportedly suffered a suspected broken hand from being kicked, and a male senior constable sustained a leg laceration. Cheeseman commented, “Melbourne has had enough. Protesters threw rocks and glass bottles at police, set bins and flags on fire — this has gone too far.” He emphasized that police used force in response to protesters’ actions, not proactively.

Victoria Premier Jacinta Allan condemned the violence, stating that protesters who acted violently must face serious legal consequences. She also said new security legislation scheduled for November would help prevent similar incidents.

Victoria Police union secretary Wayne Gatt compared the scenes to Northern Ireland in the 1970s, calling them “filthy and disgusting,” and criticized that only police rights were unprotected while extreme protesters were “completely out of touch with reality.”

Counter-protesters criticized police for restricting the demonstration rights of thousands and allegedly tolerating the racist intent of the anti-immigration rally. They claimed that at least five protesters were hospitalized, although police said no reports had been received.

Similar protests took place in Sydney and Brisbane on the same day, but without the severe violence seen in Melbourne.

Continue Reading

Trending