Connect with us

National News

New South Wales Anti-Protest Law Ruled Unconstitutional

Published

on

On October 16, 2025, the New South Wales Supreme Court ruled that a law granting police expanded powers to disperse protesters near places of worship was unconstitutional.

The ruling followed a challenge by the Palestine Action Group (PAG) against the state government’s new law passed in February 2025. PAG’s lawyers argued that the vague wording of the law made it difficult for both protesters and law enforcement to clearly understand its scope. As a result, many people might self-censor and refrain from political protests in public spaces for fear of being removed or charged.

The law was part of a broader set of reforms introduced by the state government in response to recent antisemitic incidents. One provision prohibited obstructing the entrances of places of worship or harassing, threatening, or intimidating people entering these places, with violations carrying a maximum two-year prison sentence. The law also gave police “move-on” powers near or inside places of worship, regardless of whether the protest targeted the religious site itself.

Justice Anna Mitchelmore ruled that the law placed an “impermissible burden” on the freedom of political communication implied in the Australian Constitution. The “in or near” move-on powers were not limited to protests directed at the religious site, making the law overly broad and creating a chilling effect on lawful protests.

The state argued that the law had an “obvious and legitimate purpose” of protecting worshippers from verbal or physical harassment, threats, or intimidation. Michael Sexton SC, representing New South Wales, contended that the “in or near” wording applied only to protests directly targeting the site. However, Mitchelmore noted that the law was aimed at protests in general, not only those involving an immediate threat or harassment. In areas of civic significance, such as Town Hall or Hyde Park, protest routes often pass close to places of worship, and the law imposed burdens beyond what the Constitution permits.

PAG spokesperson Josh Lees said after the ruling that the group had never staged protests targeting religious sites, and the law extended police powers to any protest near such locations. NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson criticized the government for overreaching and restricting civil liberties under a climate of panic.

Continue Reading

National News

Former Journalist Peter Hardwick Faces Child Improper Treatment Charges

Published

on

Continue Reading

National News

Bupa Admits Misleading Thousands of Customers While Executives Receive Bonuses

Published

on

On October 19, 2025, Australian insurance company Bupa awarded over AUD 14 million in bonuses to more than 20 senior executives for the 2023–2024 fiscal year. One executive received AUD 2.5 million, more than double their AUD 1.1 million salary, while 19 others shared AUD 11.6 million in bonuses, including AUD 5.5 million in deferred payments.

This comes after Bupa admitted that between 2018 and 2023, over 7,500 customers were misled, resulting in canceled or delayed medical procedures. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) found some customers were incorrectly upgraded or denied timely medical treatment. Bupa agreed to pay AUD 35 million in fines, though the Federal Court has not yet determined if the penalty is appropriate.

Consumer Health Forum CEO Elizabeth Deveny criticized the bonuses, saying, “When a company breaches consumer trust, millions in executive bonuses send the wrong message.” Bupa stated that the issues stemmed from systemic errors rather than individual wrongdoing and implemented corrective measures since 2021, including AUD 14.3 million in compensation for 4,100 incorrect claims. They also disciplined executives and revised bonus policies.

Experts have noted that awarding large bonuses amid such failures highlights a corporate culture prioritizing financial performance over customer responsibility. It remains unclear if executives will be required to return part of their bonuses.

Continue Reading

National News

Melbourne Anti-Immigration Rally Clashes with Anti-Racism Protesters

Published

on

On October 19, 2025, large-scale anti-immigration protests erupted in Melbourne’s city center, coinciding with counter-protests against racism. The two groups clashed violently, resulting in two police officers being hospitalized. Police plan to use extensive CCTV and body-worn camera footage to identify and prosecute individuals who engaged in violent behavior. One woman may face charges.

The anti-immigration rally, organized by March for Australia, opposed what organizers describe as mass migration policies and attracted a large crowd. Victoria Police used flashbangs, pepper spray, and rubber bullets to control crowds and prevent escalation. Superintendent Wayne Cheeseman said members of the counter-protest, “United Against Racism: Migrants and Refugees Are Welcome,” were desperately trying to confront the anti-immigration demonstrators.

Protesters threw large rocks, glass bottles, and rotten fruit at police during the chaos. One female officer reportedly suffered a suspected broken hand from being kicked, and a male senior constable sustained a leg laceration. Cheeseman commented, “Melbourne has had enough. Protesters threw rocks and glass bottles at police, set bins and flags on fire — this has gone too far.” He emphasized that police used force in response to protesters’ actions, not proactively.

Victoria Premier Jacinta Allan condemned the violence, stating that protesters who acted violently must face serious legal consequences. She also said new security legislation scheduled for November would help prevent similar incidents.

Victoria Police union secretary Wayne Gatt compared the scenes to Northern Ireland in the 1970s, calling them “filthy and disgusting,” and criticized that only police rights were unprotected while extreme protesters were “completely out of touch with reality.”

Counter-protesters criticized police for restricting the demonstration rights of thousands and allegedly tolerating the racist intent of the anti-immigration rally. They claimed that at least five protesters were hospitalized, although police said no reports had been received.

Similar protests took place in Sydney and Brisbane on the same day, but without the severe violence seen in Melbourne.

Continue Reading

Trending