The Guardian has revealed that One Nation leader Pauline Hanson and former deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce have been accused of using taxpayer funds to travel to a luxury cruise ship, The World, hosted by mining billionaire Gina Rinehart, to attend a series of private fundraising and donor events. The revelations have raised questions over whether the expenses comply with parliamentary allowance rules.
According to parliamentary records, the two politicians made multiple trips between Sydney, Brisbane, and other cities in December last year, claiming airfare and accommodation expenses totalling more than AUD 3,000 to attend private functions held on the luxury vessel. The ship is described as one of the world’s most exclusive residential cruise ships, housing wealthy residents and featuring high-end restaurants, tennis courts, and private apartments.
The report said the events included a political fundraising dinner in Brisbane, as well as private lunches with business figures while the ship was docked in Sydney Harbour. Pauline Hanson and her daughter also reportedly hosted closed-door meetings with corporate leaders on board the vessel. Some of the events involved party fundraising activities, including auctions of high-value items linked to US President Donald Trump, which raised around AUD 300,000 in donations.
Under Australia’s parliamentary conduct rules, taxpayer-funded travel is only permitted when the primary purpose is parliamentary business, and explicitly prohibits its use for fundraising or political donation activities. However, Barnaby Joyce acknowledged attending the fundraising events, stating they were part of party duties and that the expenses were processed through his office.
Gina Rinehart is also reported to have hosted some of the events, though she has not responded to specific questions about the details. Electoral Commission rules require declarations to be made if relevant interests exceed certain thresholds.
Commentary:
Under the rules, taxpayer funding can only be used when the primary purpose of travel is parliamentary work, while fundraising or political donation activities are explicitly excluded. However, in practice, the “primary purpose” of such trips involving business gatherings and fundraising events often becomes blurred, creating a grey area where interpretations differ. As a result, even when controversies arise, they tend to fade without meaningful institutional resolution.
Of course, politics inherently requires fundraising and engagement with society. The issue lies in whether it is appropriate for such participation to be publicly funded. When MPs attend closed-door, high-end events hosted by billionaires on luxury cruise ships, even if framed as “social” or “networking” occasions, the substance of these events may drift away from the public interest and instead become spaces for the exchange of political influence and financial networks—activities that should not be subsidised by taxpayer money.