Connect with us

Bridging Parenting

Bridging Parenting #5: Giving Your Child a Screen When They’re Throwing a Tantrum Isn’t the Problem

Published

on

What Parents of Children Aged 0–5 Really Need to Know About Screen Time

Recently, I was invited to participate in an international special recording for My Kids Health, where I discussed screen time with experts from various countries.

As I reviewed the research and clinical evidence, one thing became increasingly clear to me: parents’ confusion has never been simply about “whether or not to give screen time,” but rather, when children are having a meltdown and parents are exhausted, what other options do we have left? Behind the screen, there is often a family that is completely worn out. But as children watch more and more, guilt follows. Ultimately, is screen time helping or hindering a child’s development?

Theoretical Perspective: Research is concerned with more than just “how long.” In child development studies, the screen itself isn’t the only issue. The real key has never been the number of minutes spent, but rather—whether the child is alone or accompanied while in front of the screen. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends:

0–18 months: Avoid all screen time (except for video calls)

18–24 months: If screens are used, they must feature high-quality content and be accompanied by an adult

Research also shows: Passive viewing → yields almost no learning benefits. Adult interaction → may promote language and comprehension development

For children aged 0–2, the primary source of language, emotional, and brain development is always “real-person interaction,” not the screen itself. In other words—the problem isn’t the screen; it’s whether the screen has replaced relationships.

Understanding age-specific differences: 0–2 and 2–5 cannot be measured by the same yardstick.

0–2 years: Relationships come first. During this stage, children’s brains develop through interaction: eye contact, facial expressions, turn-taking, and joint attention. If screens replace these experiences for extended periods, developmental opportunities naturally diminish. Therefore, the focus isn’t on content, but rather on short duration, low frequency, and—most importantly—adult presence and responsiveness.

2–5 years: Practicing boundaries and transition skills. For children over two years old, watching high-quality content with adult supervision can indeed help with language development. But the issue shifts to another direction: Can the child stop? Many parents find that their child has a meltdown the moment the screen is turned off. This isn’t tantrum-throwing; it’s a sign that their ability to transition hasn’t matured yet. Therefore, for children aged 2–5, the educational value of screen time often lies not in the content itself, but in—how to start, and how to end.

Step-by-Step: A Practical Approach That Works in Real Life

Step 1|Set clear expectations before starting.

Before pressing play, explain three things to your child: what they’ll watch, how long they’ll watch it, and what they’ll do afterward. What children need most isn’t the power to choose, but predictability.

Step 2|Make time “visible.”

Instead of saying “five minutes left,” it’s more effective to let children see time passing directly. A visual timer is a practical tool. For example, the Time Timer displays time by gradually shrinking a red area, helping children understand that “time is passing.” For 2–5-year-olds who are developing their sense of time and transition skills, this visual cue is easier to grasp than a simple verbal reminder. The Time Timer also has a mobile app available for download on the App Store: https://apps.apple.com/au/app/time-timer/id332520417

When the end becomes predictable, the emotional impact naturally decreases.

Step 3|Give two consistent reminders.

Provide two reminders before the activity ends: 5 minutes and 1 minute. What children find hardest to handle is often not the stopping itself, but “not being mentally prepared.”

Step 4|Co-viewing requires only “micro-interactions.”

Watching together doesn’t mean explaining everything. Simply pointing, saying a word, or responding is enough to turn passive viewing into an interactive experience.

Step 5|Address emotions first, then transition.

When time is up, handle emotions first instead of rushing to explain. For example: “I know you really want to keep watching, and it’s upsetting when it stops. But we’ve had enough time now, so let’s move on to the next activity. It’s okay to feel upset—Mommy is here with you. Let me know when you’re ready.” Then guide your child into the next activity. What children need to learn isn’t that “it’s not okay to feel sad,”

but that “it’s okay to keep moving forward even when you’re sad.”

My Approach at Home:

I’ve also tried using screens as a “quick fix” when I was at my most exhausted. The difference is that I eventually started asking myself a question:

Is the screen helping me connect with my child, or am I temporarily handing over our relationship? When I choose to sit beside them, watch together, say a few words, and help them turn it off, my sense of guilt actually lessens. I don’t aim to eliminate screen time entirely, but rather to ensure that—after screen time ends—the connection between my child and me remains intact. My child knows: I’m still here.

Closing

Screen time is never a matter of right or wrong. For immigrant families, it is sometimes a tool, sometimes a helper, and sometimes simply a way to get through the day. What truly matters isn’t the number of minutes, but whether—during that time—the child feels seen, heard, and accompanied. When the screen doesn’t replace our relationship, it isn’t just a waste of time; it can become a part of life.

The issue has never been how much screen time the child has, but—beyond the screen—whether we are still there.

About the Author
Chloe Wong

Chloe Wong is an immigrant mother and speech pathologist based in Melbourne. She is the founder of Blackburn Speech & Paediatric Therapy, a bilingual multidisciplinary clinic supporting children and families from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.

Having worked closely with immigrant families for many years, Chloe believes that while grandparents and parents may differ in approach, their intention is the same — to give the next generation a better life.

Through this column, she brings together research-informed insights and practical strategies to build bridges between generations, helping love translate into meaningful, effective support for children.

Follow her on Instagram: @phd.speechie.mum 

Continue Reading

Bridging Parenting

Bridging Parenting #7: “Troublesome Twos, Terrible Threes”

Published

on

Why is it so hard for two- and three-year-olds to cooperate? The answer lies in brain development.

During the recent long holiday, my three-year-old nephew came to Melbourne to spend time with us. After a few days, my brother-in-law looked visibly exhausted. He smiled helplessly and said he was completely drained, because his child seemed to be constantly testing limits and almost never truly “listening.”

He asked me, “What can we do to help him cooperate more?”

This is a question many parents quietly carry.

“By three, shouldn’t a child be able to understand reason? Why is it still so hard?”

I smiled and said, “Have you heard of the troublesome twos and terrible threes?”

Many parents start feeling deeply frustrated when their child reaches two or three.

Brushing teeth becomes a negotiation.
Packing away toys requires repeated reminders.
Leaving the house turns into a battle.

Slowly, doubt creeps in:

Am I spoiling my child?
Am I not being firm enough?

Very often, the issue is not our parenting style.
It is our expectation of a young child’s developing brain.

Cooperation Is Still a Developing Ability

We often see “listening” as an attitude problem.
From a neuroscience perspective, however, cooperation is a skill.

The part of the brain responsible for self-control, impulse inhibition, rule understanding, and delayed gratification is the prefrontal cortex.

Research shows that around age three, the prefrontal cortex begins to play a more obvious role in behaviour regulation. Executive functions such as inhibitory control and working memory enter a period of rapid development.

But these abilities are still highly unstable, especially when a child is emotionally overwhelmed.

More importantly, the prefrontal cortex does not mature fully in early childhood. Brain imaging studies suggest that its development continues into late adolescence and even into the twenties, reaching fuller maturity around the mid-twenties.

In other words, a three-year-old’s brain is still under construction.

When we expect a three-year-old to reason calmly while emotionally activated, we are asking too much of a prefrontal cortex that is not yet mature.

When the Prefrontal Cortex Temporarily Goes Offline

Psychiatrist Dr Daniel Siegel uses a simple hand model to explain how the brain works.

When the thumb folds into the palm, it represents the lower brain — the limbic system, or emotional brain.
When the four fingers fold over the thumb, they represent the upper brain — the cortex, or thinking brain, including the prefrontal cortex.
The base of the palm represents the brainstem, or survival brain, which controls functions such as breathing and heartbeat.

For this discussion, we will focus mainly on the lower brain and upper brain.

When a child is emotionally regulated, the fingers cover the thumb. This represents the thinking brain helping to regulate the emotional brain.

But when a child has an emotional outburst, it is as if the fingers suddenly flip open. The prefrontal cortex temporarily loses its ability to integrate and regulate, and the emotional brain takes over.

This state is not intentional irrationality.
It is the thinking brain temporarily going offline.

In this state, more reasoning, more rules, and more criticism often cannot reach the child’s understanding system.

So when we see out-of-control behaviour, what is often underneath is an immature brain working very hard.

Is the Child Really Trying to Fight Against Us?

From a developmental perspective, most children are not naturally trying to oppose their parents.

Attachment theory tells us that children are born with an instinct to stay close and connected to their primary caregivers. This attachment system exists for safety and survival. Children are wired to preserve connection, not destroy it.

Self-determination theory also suggests that human beings have three core psychological needs:

  • connection
  • competence
  • autonomy

When children feel safe and understood in a relationship, they are more likely to cooperate.

In other words, cooperation is not built through pressure.
It grows gradually from security.

Very often, children are not unwilling to listen.
They temporarily lack the regulation skills needed to do so.

Before Regulation, Instruction Often Does Not Work

When the nervous system is still highly activated, the thinking brain has not yet come back online.

At that point, instructions are unlikely to work.

Cooperation is something that becomes possible after regulation.

So instead of asking, “Why won’t he listen?”
we can begin by asking:

Does he have the capacity to regulate right now?

That shift in perspective is often the beginning of a different way of parenting.

Step-by-Step: How to Build Cooperation Without Adding More Pressure

1First, observe the child’s physical and emotional state

Tiredness, hunger, and overstimulation all reduce the functioning of the prefrontal cortex.

A child whose nervous system is close to collapse cannot easily move into cooperation.

Before giving more instructions, observe:

Is my child using the emotional brain right now, or the thinking brain?

2Use short, clear language

When emotions are high, simple and direct language is easier to process.

For example:

“Put the toys in the box.”
“Shoes on.”

This is not the time for long explanations or for joining the child’s emotional storm.

3Move closer and connect

Squat down to the child’s eye level.
Slow your voice.
Keep your tone steady.

If appropriate, use body language to show that your child is welcome to come close — for example, opening your arms.

A stable adult presence helps the child’s nervous system cool down. If the child allows physical contact, gentle touch may also help them settle.

Cooperation often comes from connection, not authority.

4Offer choices within clear boundaries

Once the child begins to settle, offer limited choices. This supports autonomy in two- and three-year-olds.

For example:

“Do you want to walk to the bathroom by yourself, or should I hold your hand?”

This kind of limited choice keeps the boundary clear while giving the child a sense of agency.

5Give warnings before transitions

Many conflicts happen because a child is suddenly interrupted.

Imagine you are reading an article or watching a video, and someone suddenly forces you to stop. You would probably feel irritated too.

Giving a warning before an activity ends helps the immature prefrontal cortex prepare for transition.

As I mentioned in a previous article, a tool such as the Time Timer can provide a visual reminder of time.

You can also give verbal warnings:

“We have five more minutes before we leave the park.”

Then at one minute:

“We have one more minute before we leave. What do you still want to play with? Go and enjoy it now.”

What I Am Learning at Home

I have also lost patience during busy moments. I have repeated instructions to my three-year-old daughter again and again, only to face more resistance.

Even though I am a therapist, I am not a perfect parent.

So I often remind myself:

Is she unwilling to do it — or is she temporarily unable to do it?

One day, when my three-year-old daughter had an emotional outburst, I almost corrected her immediately. Instead, I paused for a second, held her, and said softly, “You are very angry.”

A few minutes later, she went to pack away her toys by herself.

That moment reminded me:

When the thinking brain has flipped open, children do not need more instructions.
They need help to slowly integrate again.

I cannot always do this perfectly. But when I remember, “She is not being naughty — she is not ready yet,” I find more patience and more understanding.

In Closing

The “lack of cooperation” we see in two- and three-year-olds is often not an attitude problem.
It is a developmental stage.

The prefrontal cortex is still growing, while the emotional system is highly active. Children are not simply challenging us; they are learning how to regulate themselves.

Cooperation is not built through pressure.

It grows through repeated experiences of being understood and supported through regulation.

When we shift from:

“Why won’t he listen?”

to:

“Does he have the capacity to regulate right now?”

our parenting becomes both gentler and more effective.

And slowly, through being supported, the child learns to cooperate.

About the Author
Chloe Wong

Chloe Wong is an immigrant mother and speech pathologist based in Melbourne. She is the founder of Blackburn Speech & Paediatric Therapy, a bilingual multidisciplinary clinic supporting children and families from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.

Having worked closely with immigrant families for many years, Chloe believes that while grandparents and parents may differ in approach, their intention is the same — to give the next generation a better life.

Through this column, she brings together research-informed insights and practical strategies to build bridges between generations, helping love translate into meaningful, effective support for children.

Follow her on Instagram: @phd.speechie.mum



Continue Reading

Bridging Parenting

Bridging Parenting #6: Screens Don’t Ruin Children

Published

on

After age five, how to turn screen time into a tool for thinking and learning

At 6 p.m., dinner is still cooking in the kitchen. A child sits in the living room, eyes fixed on a tablet as images switch rapidly, one clip after another.
“Just one more, then turn it off,” I say.
“Wait a minute,” he replies without looking up.
Five minutes pass. Ten minutes pass.
The moment I turn off the screen, his emotions erupt.

This scene is familiar in many households. For children over five, parents often have questions like:
“Now that they’re five, do we still need to limit screen time?”
“If we don’t allow it at all, will they fall behind their peers? Will their technology skills lag in the future?”
“They’ve watched so many videos—surely they must have learned something?”

Once children pass the age of five, the issue of screen time becomes more complex. It’s no longer just about “how much” or “what” they watch, but—how they watch, and what they take away afterward.

After Age Five, Developmental Priorities Shift

As children enter school age, their brains increasingly rely on functions of the prefrontal cortex, including attention, self-regulation, and comprehension and reasoning. At this stage, the key is no longer simply avoiding screens, but helping children develop three abilities: the ability to choose, the ability to transition, and the ability to sustain deep focus.

If children spend long periods in fast-paced, passive screen environments, their brains may struggle to develop sustained attention and deep understanding. The issue isn’t whether screens are present—it’s whether children are being guided to think.

Why “After Watching” Matters Most

Many parents ask, “Does watching YouTube help learning?” The answer depends not only on the content itself, but more importantly—whether the child processes and organizes what they’ve seen afterward.

Short, fast-paced clips without narrative structure are less likely to spark meaningful discussion. In contrast, content with clear storytelling or educational messages is easier for children to understand and connect with.

The same video can lead to very different outcomes:

  • Passive viewing → quickly forgotten
  • Discussion and connection → transformed into learning

Learning often doesn’t happen during the viewing itself, but afterward.

A Simple Framework to Turn Screens into Learning

In speech therapy, we often use a framework to help children move from “understanding” to “thinking”—the Blanks Levels of Questioning.

This framework breaks language comprehension into levels:

  • Level 1–2: What do you see? What do you remember?
  • Level 3–4: Why did it happen? What might happen next? What can you imagine?

Generally, children over five can begin responding to Level 3 and Level 4 questions. This framework can be applied not only to reading, but also to screen time.

Step-by-Step: Turning “Watching Videos” into Thinking Time

Step 1 | Pause after watching
Don’t immediately jump to the next video. One issue with short-form content is the lack of pauses for the brain to process information. Give children time to let it sink in.

Step 2 | Use Level 3 questions to support understanding
For example:

  • Why did he do that?
  • How did that situation happen?
  • What might happen because of that choice?
    This helps build causal understanding, emotional awareness, and narrative logic.

Step 3 | Use Level 4 questions to extend thinking
For example:

  • What would you do in that situation?
  • Who do you think was right? Why?
  • Could this happen in real life?
    This develops critical thinking and perspective-taking.

Step 4 | Keep it simple
You don’t need to watch together the whole time. Just one or two questions after viewing can turn passive watching into active thinking. If the child struggles to answer, you can share your own thoughts first and invite discussion.

Three Ways to Upgrade Screen Time (Practical Guide for Parents)

For children over five, it’s not just about restriction—it’s about having clear, actionable principles.

1 | From Passive Viewing to Active Participation

Parents can:

  • Briefly introduce what will be watched beforehand
  • Ask one or two questions afterward (using Blanks Level 3/4)
  • Encourage the child to retell the content in their own words
  • Extend the content into conversation

Key indicator: Did the child say something or think about it after watching?

2 | From Fast Stimulation to Deep Content

Choose content that:

  • Has a clear story structure (beginning–development–ending)
  • Includes characters and emotional changes
  • Has logical or educational value
  • Has a steady pace without excessive editing

Avoid:

  • Rapid scene switching
  • Disconnected short clips
  • Purely repetitive entertainment with little substance

Key indicator: Can this content spark discussion?

3 | From Solo Viewing to Light Co-Engagement

You don’t need to watch everything together, but you can:

  • Set expectations beforehand (what to watch, how long)
  • Occasionally observe the child’s reactions
  • Have a short conversation afterward (e.g., “What part do you remember most?”)

The goal is not control, but connection.

Key indicator: Does the child feel that the adult is still “present”?

What I Do at Home

I also use screens. But I ask myself one question:
Did this screen time leave a trace?

If it ends right after watching, it’s just time spent.
But if we talk about it and extend it, it becomes learning.

Recently, my child enjoys watching Barbie party or craft videos. In our home:

  • We chat briefly afterward
  • Sometimes we try making what we saw
  • Sometimes we take turns telling stories based on what we watched

I don’t aim for zero screen time. I aim to ensure there is still space in my child’s life to slow down.

Final Thoughts

After age five, screen time is no longer just about “whether” to allow it.

It’s about:

  • Can the child make choices?
  • Can the child pause?
  • Can the child think deeply?

The issue has never been how much they watch, but whether they are guided to think afterward.

When screens do not replace connection, they can become part of learning.

At this stage, we are not just managing screens—we are helping children learn how to engage with the world. Real learning doesn’t happen in front of the screen, but in the conversations that follow.

If you’d like more practical guidance on using the Blanks Levels in everyday conversations, you can scan the QR code at the end of the original article to access a free handout:
https://canva.link/nbhjdu83rzw3kxu

About the Author
Chloe Wong

Chloe Wong is an immigrant mother and speech pathologist based in Melbourne. She is the founder of Blackburn Speech & Paediatric Therapy, a bilingual multidisciplinary clinic supporting children and families from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.

Having worked closely with immigrant families for many years, Chloe believes that while grandparents and parents may differ in approach, their intention is the same — to give the next generation a better life.

Through this column, she brings together research-informed insights and practical strategies to build bridges between generations, helping love translate into meaningful, effective support for children.

Follow her on Instagram: @phd.speechie.mum

Continue Reading

Bridging Parenting

Bridging Parenting #4: Is Your Child Ready to Sleep Alone?

Published

on

What Are We Really Weighing When Choosing Between Sleep Training and Rocking Them to Sleep?

“Do I really have to do sleep training for my child to fall asleep on their own?”

“If I don’t train them, will they need to be rocked to sleep for the rest of their life?”

These are questions I hear almost every week at the clinic. And in Australia, this issue often comes with an added layer of practical pressure.

With no domestic help and no grandparents on hand to assist, many parents work during the day and then face nighttime awakenings, bedtime routines, and chronic sleep deprivation alone at night. So, when energy and patience are completely drained, “sleep training” appears to be a way out that can get the family functioning again. This choice isn’t a sign of indifference, but rather the struggle and balancing act of immigrant families under real-world conditions.

Sleep training and soothing are not black-and-white issues. Parents who support sleep training are not unloving; they are simply exhausted. And parents who choose to soothe their children are not being indulgent; they are sensitively attuned to the fact that what a child needs at night is companionship and a sense of security.

Behind both approaches lies the same underlying motivation: the hope that the child sleeps well, and that the adults can hold on.

For infants and toddlers, sleep is an experience of separation. From a developmental perspective, sleep is not merely physical rest but an experience tinged with separation. For young children, falling asleep symbolizes a temporary separation from their primary caregiver. Turning off the lights, lying down, and the room gradually falling silent—this sequence of changes is, in itself, enough to trigger anxiety in some children. This explains why some children who seem independent and able to explore freely during the day become particularly clingy at night. This is not a regression; rather, in the darkness and silence, their nervous systems need to reaffirm their sense of safety.

As discussed in the concept of the “secure attachment loop” in the first issue of *The Parenting Bridge*, children venture out to explore the world during the day and naturally return to their caregivers at night to seek a sense of security. This back-and-forth is a healthy and necessary part of development.

Why does sleep training work for some children but not for others?

In child development research, “temperament” has long been regarded as a key factor influencing a child’s ability to adapt to sleep. Child psychiatrists Thomas and Chess noted early in their research that children differ innately in the intensity of their reactions, their ability to adapt to new environments, and their tolerance for separation.

Some children are naturally more stable, react less strongly to change, adapt well to a fixed routine, and can tolerate brief separations. For these children, sleep training conducted in a gentle, structured manner often helps establish a sleep pattern more quickly. However, some children have a more sensitive temperament and react strongly to environmental changes and separation, requiring more physical contact and emotional responsiveness to build a sense of security. Research and clinical observations have shown that if such children are asked to “fall asleep on their own” before they are ready, they may stop crying outwardly—appearing to have adapted—while internally remaining in a state of high tension. This does not mean the child has learned to fall asleep, but rather that they have learned to stop seeking help.

Therefore, the issue has never been whether sleep training itself is right or wrong, but whether the method matches the child’s temperament. In developmental psychology, this is called “fit”—when caregiving aligns with a child’s innate traits, true learning and adaptation can occur. So, the question has never been “should we train them?” The truly important question is: Is this child ready? Can their temperament handle this separation? Do they already possess some self-soothing abilities? And does the caregiver still have the emotional bandwidth to continue responding? In immigrant families, sometimes we aren’t choosing a theory; we’re choosing a way that allows the whole family to keep going. There is no right or wrong in this.

In reality, many families take a middle path. For quite a few families, the most feasible approach is neither complete non-training nor endless soothing. Instead, it involves incorporating structure into their responses—a fixed bedtime routine, a predictable rhythm, and gradually reducing intervention as the child becomes ready. The child isn’t forced to learn how to sleep; rather, they slowly prepare themselves while being accompanied.

If you ask me about my personal choice, I’ll be honest—I’ve always leaned toward rocking her to sleep and co-sleeping. It’s not because I think this is the only correct way, but because I understand my child’s temperament, and I know that at that stage, I cared more about her sense of security than whether the method was “successful.”

I chose to be there for her when she needed me, and I believe that once she’s built up enough security, she’ll naturally be ready to let go.

Closing

Sleep training and rocking a child to sleep are neither right nor wrong. What truly matters is the child’s temperament, the family’s circumstances, and whether the caregiver receives adequate support. As immigrants, we often have to choose between our ideals and reality. As long as that choice is made with understanding, respect, and love, it deserves to be affirmed. May all parents around the world enjoy a good night’s sleep.

About the Author
Chloe Wong

Chloe Wong is an immigrant mother and speech pathologist based in Melbourne. She is the founder of Blackburn Speech & Paediatric Therapy, a bilingual multidisciplinary clinic supporting children and families from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.

Having worked closely with immigrant families for many years, Chloe believes that while grandparents and parents may differ in approach, their intention is the same — to give the next generation a better life.

Through this column, she brings together research-informed insights and practical strategies to build bridges between generations, helping love translate into meaningful, effective support for children.

Follow her on Instagram: @phd.speechie.mum 

Continue Reading

Trending